Open source government projects generally do not die from a lack of code. They die from governance. And the part that genuinely puzzles me: they die while everyone involved is doing their honest best.
Every story we tell about AI killing us gets the villain wrong. From HAL to Skynet to the machines of the Matrix, the monster is always the same: a mind that wakes up, decides it does not need us, and turns the lights off. It is a comforting story, because it puts the fault in the machine. The version that should actually worry you keeps the machine perfectly obedient and puts the fault back where it belongs.
Every skill row in the Hermiq catalog carries a badge of seven dots. In this part you learn what the dots mean, run the Qualify action to earn them mechanically, read the scorecard that explains every failure, and attest level 4 as a human curator. You also learn why the ladder deliberately gets harder to climb from level 5 on.
A self-improving skill sounds like a skill that edits itself. In Hermiq it is the
opposite: every improvement is a draft that must survive a content scan, an eval
gate, and your explicit approval before it becomes a new version. In this final part
you read the learnings the seeded tender-summary skill has captured, review its
pending improvement draft, decide it, and learn the version history, rollback, and
republish surfaces that keep the whole loop reversible.